Why TOON Feels So Much Better Than JSON

In the age of large language models (LLMs) and AI-driven systems, one of the most overlooked bottlenecks is how structured data is fed into these models. For decades we’ve relied on JSON — JavaScript Object Notation — as the lingua franca of data interchange. But now a new format, TOON (Token-Oriented Object Notation), is emerging specifically to unlock AI workflows. That begs the question: Why does TOON feel so much better than JSON for AI contexts? Let’s explore.

---

What Is TOON and Why It Matters

TOON is a serialization format designed for the AI era. According to its specification:

“Token-Oriented Object Notation is a compact, human-readable encoding of the JSON data model for LLM prompts.”

In simpler terms, it’s the same data you’d express in JSON — objects, arrays, primitives — but with a syntax optimized to use fewer tokens, making it ideal for sending to LLMs. FreeCodeCamp sums it up:

“While JSON uses verbose syntax with braces, quotes, and commas, TOON relies on a token-efficient tabular style, which is much closer to how LLMs naturally understand structured data.”

In modern AI systems, especially those interacting with LLMs or multi-agent workflows, tokens are cost, latency and context space. That shift is why TOON matters.

---

JSON’s Strengths — and Its Weaknesses in the AI Era

JSON brought clarity, interoperability and ease of use:

• Language-agnostic, widely supported.
• Human-readable and easy to parse manually or programmatically.
• Great for APIs, config files, inter-service messaging.

However, when feeding data into LLMs or handling mass structured data for AI, JSON begins to show limitations:

• Verbosity: Keys, quotes, braces and commas accumulate tokens.
• Token inefficiency: Every character matters when you pay per token in LLMs and have limited context windows.
• Redundancy: Repeated keys and deep nesting inflate the size of prompt payloads.
• AI-misfit syntax: LLMs are less optimized for parsing heavy punctuation bombardment; tabular or simplified formats align better with their internal tokenization logic.

In short: JSON works splendidly for human and machine interchange, but it wasn’t built with LLM-token economy in mind.

---

TOON’s Advantages: Why It Feels Better

1. Token Efficiency

Benchmarks show TOON can reduce token usage by 30–60% compared to JSON. Fewer tokens mean reduced cost, less latency, and more space for useful data in an LLM prompt.

---

2. Human-Readable Yet AI-Friendly

TOON retains readability: its syntax is lighter and tabular, making it easier for developers to inspect than binary formats; yet it’s also more aligned with how LLMs parse tokens. This dual readability appeals to both devs and AI systems.

---

3. Structure Over Noise

TOON emphasizes data structure (objects, arrays) without the verbosity of punctuation overload. It reduces noise for the model, improving the clarity of schema and semantics. One article notes:

“Schema-aware formats like TOON help agents validate data structure. This reduces hallucinations and parsing errors.”

---

4. Better for Large or Uniform Data Sets

When dealing with tabular data, arrays of objects, or repeated fields — common in AI training, feature ingestion, or prompt construction — TOON’s compact representation scales much better than JSON.

---

5. Improved AI Performance

Because you input fewer redundant tokens, you free up more of your model’s context window for meaningful data or reasoning. That translates to faster inference, lower cost, and better model focus.

---

Example Comparison

Here’s a simplified conceptual comparison (note: illustrative syntax):

JSON version

{
  "users": [
    { "id": 1, "name": "Alice", "active": true },
    { "id": 2, "name": "Bob", "active": false }
  ]
}

TOON version

users:
  - id: 1
    name: Alice
    role: admin
  - id: 2
    name: Bob
    role: user

---

When TOON Isn’t the Right Choice

It’s important to be realistic: TOON isn’t a universal replacement for JSON. There are scenarios where JSON remains preferable:

• Broad interoperability: Most web APIs, config files, libraries expect JSON.
• Complex nested structures: Very deep nested objects may lose clarity if forced into ultra-compact syntax.
• Established systems: Existing toolchains, parsers, validators and ecosystems built around JSON may not yet support TOON.
• Human editing priority: If you prioritize manual editing with tooling support over token economy, JSON may still win.

In Dev.to’s words:

“Use TOON when token efficiency and large, uniform data are involved. Use JSON when interoperability and parsing reliability for deeply nested data are required.”

---

How to Adopt TOON Today

1. Start with your LLM-ingestion layer: Where you send structured data into GPT/Claude/agents, evaluate switching to TOON to save tokens.
2. Use libraries and encoder/decoder support: Open-source tooling is available: the GitHub repo summarises how TOON encodes JSON model directly.
3. Test token usage and performance: Compare identical payloads in JSON vs TOON in terms of token count, latency, model output quality.
4. Maintain human-readability: Keep a balance: create tooling or linters so your team can still read TOON easily.
5. Combine formats: Hybrid strategy: use TOON for internal AI pipelines, keep JSON for external APIs and legacy systems.

---

The Future: TOON and AI Data Infrastructure

As AI systems evolve toward multi-agent workflows, real-time interaction, and massive data ingestion, the efficiency of every token and every prompt matters. TOON represents a step change:

• Lower ingestion cost: Scales internal AI agents with less token overhead.
• Higher accuracy: Improved structure reduces parsing errors, model drift.
• Context-rich prompts: More space for meaningful context and reasoning.
• Ecosystem shift: Formatting and tooling may evolve to cater to AI-native data flows rather than human-first design.

In time, we may see TOON (or derivatives) become an established format for AI-driven pipelines, much like JSON became standard for web APIs.

---

Apptastic Insight

TOON doesn’t “feel better” simply because it’s newer—it feels better because it’s optimized for the present challenge: feeding rich structured data into AI models with minimal waste. For developers building AI agents, pipelines and systems in 2025, TOON is a compelling format that bridges readability, efficiency and token economy.

If you’re still using JSON out of habit, it might be time to ask: What percent of my tokens are wasted on punctuation, repeated keys and braces? Switching to TOON may not just make your data smaller—it may make your AI smarter, faster and cheaper.